The sources used in my language investigation were collected
from my household and although some of them are addressed to myself, some are
also addressed to family members who are residents at the same address. This
raises an ethical issue of confidentiality which I addressed by gaining
informed consent from the person the letter belonged to. I constructed a letter
that explained how I would be using the letter to see how power was being
asserted with the language construction.
Furthermore, I explained how their identity would be kept private and
confidential as I would be blacking out any personal details that could lead to
their identity or personal information being revealed. To some extent I could
not completely ensure confidentiality as my investigation is based on letters
coming to my household which creates a direct link to some of the letters being
about my family members who live in the house. However, so that this wasn’t an
issue I explicitly explained in my letter that it would be made clear that the
letters would be referred to as coming from my house but that the use would
only be “for academic purposes”. To
ensure my findings would be reliable, I collected all of my letters over a 12
month period. This would widen my data pool and ensure the letters I was
collecting were a true representation of letters coming into my household. This
also improves the reliability of my data as it shows it is constant over time
and not just a snap shot which makes it valid.
Good start. The more detail you can give of your thinking e.g. particular wording in the letter and how it is suited to APF, the better and any evaluation of how confidentiality might be compromised and what you will do to mitigate that with examples would be good.
ReplyDelete