I feel like
my data is representative of my data pool as I collected it over a 12 month
period which enabled me to collect a wide range of letters. However there was a
slight limitation as I had to eliminate certain letters from the data pool.
This was due to confidentiality reasons, so I had to remove them so that my
investigation remained ethical. In spite of this, I so still feel like I was
able to collect enough data to analyse. There are several examples of things I
will be able to quantify from my data. For example, I could observe the
frequency of when imperatives are used to assert power of a command to the
reader. Furthermore, I could also look at the number of times deontic modal
verbs are used to imply an obligation to do what the letter is requesting. One
aspect of my data that I had not originally considered that could lead to me
slightly changing the focus of my investigation is to make sure I consider
certain variables that will lead to different amount of power techniques/strategies
used between individual letters. These variables are the ones suggested by
Brown and Levinson, how social distance, power distance and the degree of
imposition has an effect on the appropriate use of linguistic strategies used
to assert power. This could have an effect on my investigation as the letters I
collected over a 12 month period are from different senders, or if they are
from the same one they are addressed to different individuals and therefore the
weight of face threats may have beeen compensated to adjust for this. The theory I
have researched so far is concordant with what I predicted I would be able
quantify from my data.
No comments:
Post a Comment